Sola Fide

Sola Fide

首頁


2015年1月29日 星期四

世界殺人數目排行榜

若有什麼生物會傷害人,人必定避之唯恐不及,甚至十分厭惡及恐懼。而什麼是最會傷害人甚至殺人的生物呢? 不是獅、虎、蠍、病蚊蠅,是人,特別是透過政治。
「歷史表明,政治會做而且一直做任何它想做的事,屠殺則是它最拿手擅長的。請算一算,單單整個二十世紀因政治而起的戰爭、總共屠殺了多少人?真是可怕地數不盡啊!這種政治殘暴絶對在自然中不可見,不,人不是政治「動物」,而是政治「惡魔」!然而,十分不幸又令人不可思議的是,人們知道且遭受政治之惡,但人卻總是熱衷於政治並或直接或間接地助紂為虐,以政治力集體說謊與殺人。」
(政治的魅惑/柯志明,20150115) http://taiwan-christians.blogspot.tw/2015/01/blog-post.html#more

世界殺人數目排行榜
https://www.bomb01.com/article/5109/%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E6%AE%BA%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%B8%E7%9B%AE%E6%8E%92%E8%A1%8C%E6%A6%9C%E9%A6%9619%E4%BD%8D%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%EF%BC%8C%E7%95%B6%E4%BD%A0%E7%9C%8B%E5%88%B0%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E5%90%8D%E4%B8%80%E5%AE%9A%E6%9C%83%E8%AE%93%E4%BD%A0%E5%A4%A7%E5%90%83%E4%B8%80%E9%A9%9A%EF%BC%81
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-real-cost-of-our-wars-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-photo-2013-3

2015年1月19日 星期一

柯志明教授,〈政治的魅惑〉/ 林文勇

「『政治正確』(political correctness)很重要,就是如何創造或選擇站在最有力、最多人支持的『主流』,或者,至少選擇不要觸犯那些最有力、最多人支持的言行禁忌。經驗證明,只要政治正確,歪理都會成為真理,不義都能成為正義,邪惡都能化身良善,惡徒也會被傳說成善良人士;相反地,一旦政治不正確,真理也會變成眾人唾棄、嘲笑的謬論,正義被攻擊為不義,良善被嘲笑為邪惡,義人會被視為罪人。這是生活的常態現象。因此,不只政治人物在乎且會政治正確,所有公共人物、影歌星,連被視為最具思想獨立的知識分子、文學家、藝術家、學者、教授、科學家,都會自動考量政治正確,連單純的學生也不例外。
這就是政治不可擋的力量,也是其魅惑所在。......

政治的魅惑〉 / 柯志明 20150115

2015年1月7日 星期三

追思會-提醒我們死亡會斷絕一切...

在追思會上,我更確定,死亡真實地斷絕一切愛的關係,而我相信真有上帝,因著上帝所應許的永生,我要與所有我關心的人繼續相愛下去。

會上有一段經文這樣說:

你們心裡不要憂愁,你們信神,也當信我。

在我父的家裡有許多住處,若是沒有,我就早已告訴你們了,
我去原是為你們預備地方去。
我若去為你們預備了地方,就必再來接你們到我那裡去,
我在哪裡,叫你們也在哪裡。我往哪裡去你們知道,那條路你們也知道。
多馬對他說:「主啊,我們不知道你往哪裡去,怎麼知道那條路呢?」
耶穌說:「我就是道路、真理、生命。
若不藉著我,沒有人能到父那裡去。你們若認識我,也就認識我的父。
從今以後,你們認識他,並且已經看見他。


約翰福音 14:1-7

2014年12月25日 星期四

Merry Christmas! 為何Merry?

http://stevewright.info/2012/12/25/merry-christmas/





Merry Christmas! 

為何耶穌誕生值得人們發自內心的喜樂呢? 

因為要幫助人脫離罪惡的挾制,然後超越死亡......






(耶穌之死: 寫在2013年聖誕節前 / 柯志明)
http://taiwanchristians.blogspot.tw/2013/12/2013.html


2014年12月19日 星期五

為何因死哀慟?

既然生生死死是自然律,
既然人不過是物質、生物、動物,既然一切存在都必趨於消亡(entropy),
那又何必為死亡哀傷呢?哀慟什麼呢?惋惜什麼呢?......
然而,我很篤定,沒有一個有人性的人會如此「科學地」對待人,對人的死亡無動於衷。
為什麼?......

為何因死哀慟?/柯志明教授 20141218
http://taiwan-christians.blogspot.tw/2014/12/blog-post.html

2014年12月18日 星期四

林慶台:上帝改變我的生命

「賽德克巴萊」飾演莫那魯道的林慶台,
以前常酗酒打架,曾六次自殺不成,且肝硬化、胃出血,瘦成皮包骨走,
直到27歲後生命有了全新的轉變…

國度復興報    林慶台:上帝改變我的生命
http://www.krtnews.com.tw/church/item/13720-%E6%9E%97%E6%85%B6%E5%8F%B0%EF%BC%9A%E4%B8%8A%E5%B8%9D%E6%94%B9%E8%AE%8A%E6%88%91%E7%9A%84%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD

2014年12月1日 星期一

不畏苦難超越理性的愛...

霍金是天才中的天才, 有非常成就。
他的前妻簡恩是基督徒, 平庸。
霍金逃不出漸凍苦難,
而簡恩因為愛, 超越理性的考量, 決意陪伴霍金, 一起進入苦難。
我相信簡恩對霍金的愛是超越理性的,
是霍金這個將理性發揮到極致的天才想不透的;
這不畏苦難超越理性的愛當然比霍金的成就更有價值…

霍金和他的前妻:万有理论,婚姻无解
http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4MzA2MTMzMA%3D%3D&mid=202331013&idx=1&sn=efdc000b66220547ecb7e3f7a1cfbf2d#rd

2014年10月22日 星期三

有鬼?



不管有沒有真的遇過鬼,
只要心裡某個角落有那麼一點相信,
這樣的相信就會對我們產生效用,
特別在經過墓園、夜深人靜的野外或遇到很衰的事時,
應該是這樣吧?!
若真的是這樣,我想,同理,
相信有真正的神(可以保護你),
應該也會對我們的生命有正面的效用吧。
當然,是不是真的有神有鬼是另一個問題,
不過,理性上,是應該繼續追問下去的問題......



2014年10月20日 星期一

數算自己的日子...

想像一下,若生命是從蒼老(的嬰兒)走向中年、青年、小孩、嬰兒然後死去,面對他人漸漸老去與自己越來越年輕,是否會更願意去尋求一顆智慧的心可以好好思想,以至於可以減少生命中難堪的荒謬、珍惜生命中的許多被愛……,好好數算自己的日子呢?
 

「我們一生的年日是七十歲,若是強壯可到八十歲,但其中所矜誇的不過是勞苦愁煩;轉眼成空,我們便如飛而去。誰曉得你怒氣的權勢?誰按著你該受的敬畏曉得你的憤怒呢?求你指教我們怎樣數算自己的日子,好叫我們得著智慧的心。」
詩篇90:10-12


概念來源:《班傑明的奇幻旅程》、王怡《天堂沉默半小時》

2014年10月19日 星期日

個體總和不等於整體

個體總和不等於整體,
就像每個完好的零件不能等於一部車,
因為這其中還缺乏了巧思、力量還有願意行動的意願。
還是,幾萬年後甚至更久,這些零件會碰巧地成為一部可以開的車呢?

事實上,除了零件(材料),還需要加入人的設計、製造、運用、組合等,
才有可能產生真正可以開的車子。
大部分的人當然沒有參與一部車的設計、製造、運用、組合,
但面對一個車子或一個不可思議的東西時,
聯想其中一定充滿著許多設計、智慧、技術等,應該是很合理的吧......



新車遭竊2小時解體 車主哭了
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%96%B0%E8%BB%8A%E9%81%AD%E7%AB%8A-%E5%B0%8F%E6%99%82%E8%A7%A3%E9%AB%94-%E8%BB%8A%E4%B8%BB%E5%93%AD%E4%BA%86-215034851.html

2014年10月10日 星期五

英文查經-馬可福音

英文查經,輕鬆英文閱讀及交談,
認識聖經ㄧ影響全世界最深遠的書。
10月9日起每周四晚上7-8點,在我家,報名洽以下說明。
~歡迎大家喔~

2014年10月6日 星期一

柯志明教授,〈刑罰與教化 〉/ 林文勇

有人闖紅燈,專家鑑定他可以被教化並保證絕不會再闖紅燈,這樣就可以使他闖紅燈要罰的錢減少嗎? 當然不行! 因為這是兩回事! 該罰的要罰才是法治,才有秩序,而且以後誰會怎樣都很難說。然而,現在的司法卻流行於為殘酷殺人犯申請鑑定將來可否被教化,來企圖減輕其犯行事實而應當的刑責,謝依涵及鄭捷就是例子,極其荒謬! 極其不公義!


…人不是機器,也不只是按本能生活的動物,而是具有自由思想、決定與行動能力的位格(person),充滿著種種存在可能性(existential possibilities)。對此,哲學家已不斷向我們申論,經驗也一再向我們表明,人心實在難以視透,行為也難以預料。就犯罪而言,我完全不相信有誰能用什麼方法去鑑定一個罪犯能否被教化,以致於是否會再犯法;我不認為這種鑑定有什麼根據,更談不上科學。


果真要談作惡的可能性,那麼歷史與日常經驗已充分顯明人都具有「向惡習性」(propensity toward evil),無人例外。連對人的道德性最樂觀的哲學家康德(Immanuel Kant)都不得不承認人性中有著無法根除的「根本惡」(radical evil),以致於作惡是如此地明顯而普遍。若此為真,則誰還能說人可教化呢?又需要作什麼鑑定呢?確實,人幾乎無能免於作惡,但我們仍堅持需要教化,理由不是因為人由此而能不再作惡,而是人藉由教化可認識自己的「罪性」以致於必須謹言慎行,並時時請求他者的道德協助。若能如此,人或許仍難免有錯,但可不致於為大惡。…


〈刑罰與教化 〉/ 柯志明20141005

2014年9月8日 星期一

康德最驚訝的兩件事是: / 林文勇

康德最驚訝的兩件事是: 
星宿竟如此有秩序地運行
與人心中竟有道德律令

我觀看你指頭所造的天 並你所陳設的月亮星宿
便說 人算什麼 你竟顧念他
世人算什麼 你竟眷顧他
(詩篇8:3-4)

月圓紀念情誼而相聚


月圓紀念情誼而相聚,
雖不能與家人朋友同在 ,
但願你們平安喜樂 ,
我為你們的禱告一直都在……



2014年9月2日 星期二

真理必叫你們得以自由



似乎,心裡有一些美善,
他人始終無法理解,
更有一些邪惡,他人總意識不到。
隨著年齡增長,要行出美善就越多顧慮,
也越會包裝掩飾心裡的邪惡。

進而,學會使用更多道德語言,
多用來指控別人。
甚至,把一些無關道德的舉動言語,
硬要冠上道德的帽子。

其實,指控別人的同時,也指控自己,
都活在被律法控訴的綑綁裡。
生命裡若沒有真理,憑著人的自大及無知,
自己己就會亂發明歪理並以為真理信奉著。
就這樣,自己的生命被歪理綑綁著,也要人如此被綑綁。


福音是最重要的:代序 / 柯志明教授

柯志明教授七年來定期給台灣晨曦會同工上課,
以下這一篇文章是柯老師為晨曦會的新書寫的代序.
晨曦會同工常是自己深受毒癮痛苦甚至家破人亡,
他們因福音而戒除毒癮後, 沒有選擇四處享受生活,
反而願意躲起來奉獻自己來幫助同樣深陷毒癮而無法自拔的其他人,
與他們同在並藉著福音幫助他們可以有新的生命,
並因此脫離毒癮的捆綁及殘害...…

福音是最重要的:代序 / 柯志明教授

2014年8月23日 星期六

政治沒有創造性—宗教是文化、社會、國家的靈魂 / 柯志明


…...政治最沒有創造力,它或許有能力結束醜惡,
但人間美善的人事物都不是它創造的。
世間最珍貴的人物、宗教、道德、思想、知識、文學、藝術、科學、技術、文化
都不是政治的直接成果,
即便政治可以為這些珍貴成果舖設社會條件,
或可以開創所謂的國家社會之「新局」。
(<政治沒有創造性—宗教是文化、社會、國家的靈魂>,柯志明)

政治沒有創造性—宗教是文化、社會、國家的靈魂 / 柯志明

2014年8月20日 星期三

阿公有很多氣球



這不像是一個阿公買很多氣球要取悅孫子,
而比較像是要養活孫子...



2014年8月18日 星期一

耶和華是我的牧者,我必不至缺乏/ 林文勇

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BF%83%E7%81%B5%E6%8D%95%E6%89%8B
大學看<心靈捕手>時心裡真的也很渴望能遇到一位「心靈捕手」,現在看著羅賓威廉斯自殺的新聞,讓我在印象破滅中更驚覺:文字及電影裡的完美「心靈捕手」形象,其實反應著每個人心裡的渴望,但可悲的是現實上沒有一個人可以勝任。因為他要知道每個人的心靈狀況、堅強與軟弱,有能力接受認錯也安慰,引導度過低潮,然後協助過良善及喜樂的生活。
我相信再堅強、順利、富裕的人的心靈深處都仍會渴望生命裡能有個心靈捕手(雖然越是這樣的人越不太會承認),當然,這樣的渴望不是在電影裡,不是在文字裡,而是真的活在我們身邊,並一直陪伴下去。這讓我想到詩篇23…

耶和華是我的牧者,我必不至缺乏。
祂使我躺臥在青草地上,領我在可安歇的水邊。
祂使我的靈魂甦醒,為自己的名引導我走義路,
為自己的名引導我走義路,引導我走義路。
我雖然行過死蔭的幽谷,也不怕遭害,
因為你與我同在;你的杖,你的竿,都安慰我。
在我敵人面前你為我擺設筵席,
你用油膏了我的頭,使我的福杯滿溢。
我一生一世,我一生一世必有恩惠、慈愛隨著我;
我一生一世,我一生一世必有恩惠、慈愛隨著我,
必有恩惠、慈愛隨著我。
我且要住在耶和華的殿中,
我且要住在耶和華的殿中,直到永遠。

2014年8月14日 星期四

天涯傳愛 - 石明理、石安莉


從英國到靜宜等中部協助團契輔導的安姐及石哥已經近40年了,因為有跟安姐面對面說過話,現在看過他們的分享後,讓我真的著實地被感動了:
誰願意離鄉背井到陌生國度無私奉獻呢?這支持著他們一路走來持續近40年的信仰力量真的太不可思議了,不可思議到好像不是真的,但又真的活現在我們面前。

真情部落格:天涯傳愛 - 石明理、石安莉

2014年8月13日 星期三

不改信教就滅村 IS屠殺500人


握有政治權力者其實常是惡魔的化身,
……如果要說政治重要甚至最重要,
那是因為政治最有能力為大惡,
最有能力大規模地使人受苦、被虐待、被折磨、被殺戮,
也最有能力使人集體地成為犯罪結構的分子,
而絶不是因為它能創造各樣美善」。



政治沒有創造性—宗教是文化、社會、國家的靈魂
柯志明


蘋果日報新聞:不改信教就滅村 IS屠殺500人

http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/international/20140811/36015030/

2014年7月29日 星期二

鬼,誰都討厭也害怕,台灣人卻要說鬼是「好兄弟」

鬼,誰都討厭也害怕,台灣人卻要說鬼是「好兄弟」,
準備許多吃的喝的用的還有錢給他們,


無非冀望他們不要來亂並請他們幫忙賺大錢,一副向黑道交保護費並想多得點別人沒有的好處的樣子。
 

這樣的生命像不像是被綁架了呢?
 

生命充斥在害怕及懷疑中甚至還有死亡的威脅:
那個不能做這個不能去,別人都做的你不做就毛毛的,
要貼個什麼又東西要怎麼擺才不會出事還可以賺大錢……

然而,我們若真的相信有鬼,
為何不相信有真正的神可以把我們從綁架中解救出來並成為我們生命的守護者呢?

2014年7月16日 星期三

台灣的食安搶先與中國統一了

台灣的食安搶先與中國統一了,或許是兩邊的上位者對待人民的思維已經先統一了使然的,還是,這其實就是金字塔頂端對底端的思維之一致表現呢? 若是,為何歐美對食安的態度卻不是如此呢?


你的官長存心被逆,與盜賊同夥;
人都貪愛賄賂,追索私酬;
他們不替孤兒伸冤,寡婦的案件也呈不到他們面前。
(賽1:23)


【央視永久禁播】舌尖上的中國真TM2 高清無印完整版
「過期半年的麵粉,祖傳的地溝油,內衣做的油擦,製造了上班族最尋常的早餐煎餅果子…­…中國人無所畏懼,他們像偉大的發明家一樣,用充滿想像力的靈感與智慧,不斷挑戰人體­可以承受的極限。」
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGp8Vn2Qw1Q&feature=youtu.be

2014年6月7日 星期六

柯志明教授,<審判使生命有意義>/ 林文勇

彎彎結婚十幾天就外遇了,有人譴責,但不少媒體輕描淡寫,更有不少聲音宣稱是「私人」、「感情」、「家務事」不應多加評論,應該「給她一點點時間」、「不應把他逼死」、「是人也會犯錯」、「最應該聽她竭盡所能道歉的不是我們」等有意地幫犯罪者講話並表現地一副很寬容有愛的姿態。

九把刀臉書寫著「不可對不正義視而不見」,平常也好評時事裡的不公義並關心流浪狗等一副正義有愛的姿態,但對自家人的罪惡相對低調並有意袒護,只會盡使用些含糊字眼說「沒有人說彎彎沒錯,沒有人要力挺到底」,來逃避自己正面的回應:不「直接」說有錯或沒錯,且暗示「有挺」只是沒有「到底」。
唉~這麼誇張的外遇竟仍可以清楚地看到台灣人對罪惡的「雙重標準」。更進一步說,這是台灣人普遍地「對罪無感、輕忽與健忘」,這成為「罪惡漫延、横行、壯大最好的藉口」,也在在見證「臺灣是個罪惡的島國」。

「今人喜好講原諒並以原諒為理所當然,基督教會也染此『廉價恩典』之風尚。這不是因為今人比較有愛心,而是輕看罪,對罪無感,也對自己的罪惡麻木不仁。他們口中的原諒是廉價的、隨便的、不需付代價的,也是自義的、驕傲的、自以為是的,但可笑的是,他們自己也不原諒那些徹底追究罪惡、要求正義而不願放過罪犯的人。『原諒』已成了罪惡漫延、横行、壯大最好的藉口,連惡人也出口閉口原諒,殺人凶手也對被害者要求原諒,甚至責備被害者們沒有原諒人的愛心。何其無恥的原諒!何其邪惡的嘴臉!」


引自柯志明<審判使生命有意義>

2011年4月30日 星期六

從達爾文的人觀看人與生物的關係(影片 The Global Family: Galapagos – The Living Laboratory)


承認生物在面對環境的變遷中隨著時間演變出適應環境的身體結構及行為似乎已是一般人都以為的常識及事實,這樣的概念來自演化論,而演化論幾乎已是生命科學甚至是所有自然科學的基礎與不容置疑的前提,更且影響社會學、教育、哲學……等人文學術發展,因此理所當然影響我們對身邊事物的理解,並因而對日常生活的影響甚大。而這樣的的理解及影響自達爾文將演化論論述推展到一定的程度後,就自此風行甚至成為主流意識了。

那,什麼是演化?什麼又是演化論呢?演化觀念與我們的生活有什麼關係呢?認同生物之間具有演化現象就必須認同演化現象可以解釋所有生物之間的關係與行為嗎?不認同演化論就等於不承認生物之間具有演化現象嗎?人與生物之間在行為上更在身體結構上有相似之處,但有相似之處就等於彼此是隨時間演變之間的差異與關係嗎?身體結構相似就等於彼此行為是隨時間演變的關係嗎?   黑猩猩使用小木枝鑽螞蟻洞取食與人類的多元的飲食文化行為是隨時間演變而來的區別嗎?......難道人的生命表現並沒有大大不同——甚至完全區別——於其他生物嗎?強調人完全區別於其他生物就等於歧視嗎?
……
        5/3方濟電影院活動將在觀賞The Global Family: Galapagos – The Living Laboratory的基礎上認識生物之間的演化現象及關係,並進一步討論自達爾文以來演化論概念與人之間的關係。人對人自己的理解直接影響到人以這樣的理解去面對周遭的事物,也就是說,人對自己的理解意味著人要以什麼態度去對待自己、他人、其他生命與非生命,甚至是與超自然。......對演化的理解與認同決定著你以什麼態度面對這個世界......

無論您認不認識達爾文或演化論,都希望您蒞臨與大家分享觀點。

2011年4月21日 星期四

回應阿彎及撒不拉,並提問「尊重」的基礎是什麼?


當沉浸其中而不得其解時,適時地去反問自己所正在思想的內容的合理性或得以存在的基礎,讓我們冷靜並不拘泥在其中而無法自拔,更是思想清晰並不容易被框限的表現。這就像從「外面」來看自己或問題本身,會有不同的視野,也因此有了不同的認識,甚至因此找到可能的答案;也就像<Home>片中由上而下的拍攝手法,讓我們不沉浸在地上的生活而嘗試用屬天的眼光來看待。

事實上,先對該主題得以成立的基礎或條件所進行的反思,常與討論中所遇到的問題與可能的解答極其相關甚至常是互相呼應的。例如:在對「何為權利?」或「權利的基礎」之思索上,宣張一個人有「權利」同時意味著其他人有「義務」不妨礙甚要主動協助他的權利得以伸張。以至於雙方都必須被告知或理解到「權利」與「義務」之間的相對關係與內容,所以權利與義務的關係就必須預設著互有溝通及理解的能力之可能性,而這樣的結論將導致:動物(或人之外的所有生物)將不具有任何權利,也因此人不對他們有任何義務。也就是說,這樣的推論已經預設著嘗試對「動物權利」作合理性的論述都會是相當薄弱的。然而,這樣預設「能力的展現」為「權利義務關係」前提之推論若訴諸於人類將產生一個嚴重的問題,即:植物人或重大傷殘或嬰兒甚至是未生出的胎兒等無法表現溝通及理解能力者,是否因此不具有任何權利並因此他人不需對他們盡任何義務呢?是的,在理論上,但很遺憾,因為人的倫常與深處的情感會告訴我們:即使他們無法表達自己的權利,仍需要主動地為他們做些什麼……,而許多福利及弱勢關懷團體的主動關懷即代表著這樣的遺憾。

2009年11月6日 星期五

日蝕、地震是末日的預兆?! 可以確定的是...

可以確定的是......


昨天地震有感並回應前一篇
..............................

日蝕
很美
是自然現象
是可計算出的
它的意義應在於驚奇上帝不可思議的創造,並在驚奇中敬畏
而不是作為一個災難或什麼預兆

實不該與「日頭就變黑了」(可24:29)等耶穌降臨預兆有關
更重要的是,
「那時人要把你們陷在患難裡,也要殺害你們,你們又要為我的名被萬民恨惡」(24:9),且「假基督、假先知將要起來顯大神蹟、大奇事」(24:24)
最重要的是,
「那日子那時辰沒有人知道,連天上的天使也不知道,子也不知道,唯獨父知道」(24:36),「你們想不到的時候人子就來了」(24:44),
「所以你們要儆醒,因為那日子那時候你們不知道 」(25:13)。

故 把日蝕等一些奇特的自然現象當作末日預兆
真是迷信 而且是基督徒的迷信
就像昨天的地震
它反而是很難去算計出來而得知的
但 它是末日警示?
不知道
但在對末日預兆更多的猜想或恐懼中只會有魔鬼的試探 只會更虛無
更是偏離愛的信仰
因為可以確定的 也是我們應緊緊捉住的是
上帝的「約」——「唯有忍耐到底的必然得救」(24:13)。

2009年5月26日 星期二

馬丁‧路德 〈九十五條論綱〉 (英文)

Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther
on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences
by Dr. Martin Luther (1517)


Published in:
Works of Martin Luther:
Adolph Spaeth, L.D. Reed, Henry Eyster Jacobs, et Al., Trans. & Eds.
(Philadelphia: A. J. Holman Company, 1915), Vol.1, pp. 29-38

http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/luther/web/ninetyfive.html

Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.
In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said Poenitentiam agite([註]“Repent” Matthew 4:17), willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance.

2. This word cannot be understood to mean sacramental penance, i.e., confession and satisfaction, which is administered by the priests.

3. Yet it means not inward repentance only; nay, there is no inward repentance which does not outwardly work divers mortifications of the flesh.

4. The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward repentance, and continues until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.

5. The pope does not intend to remit, and cannot remit any penalties other than those which he has imposed either by his own authority or by that of the Canons.

6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God's remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would remain entirely unforgiven.

7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest.

8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to them, nothing should be imposed on the dying.

9. Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us, because in his decrees he always makes exception of the article of death and of necessity.

10. Ignorant and wicked are the doings of those priests who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penances for purgatory.

11. This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were sown while the bishops slept.

12. In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.

13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are already dead to canonical rules, and have a right to be released from them.

14. The imperfect health [of soul], that is to say, the imperfect love, of the dying brings with it, of necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater is the fear.

15. This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.

17. With souls in purgatory it seems necessary that horror should grow less and love increase.

18. It seems unproved, either by reason or Scripture, that they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of increasing love.

19. Again, it seems unproved that they, or at least that all of them, are certain or assured of their own blessedness, though we may be quite certain of it.

20. Therefore by "full remission of all penalties" the pope means not actually "of all," but only of those imposed by himself.

21. Therefore those preachers of indulgences are in error, who say that by the pope's indulgences a man is freed from every penalty, and saved;

22. Whereas he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to the canons, they would have had to pay in this life.

23. If it is at all possible to grant to any one the remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that this remission can be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to the very fewest.

24. It must needs be, therefore, that the greater part of the people are deceived by that indiscriminate and highsounding promise of release from penalty.

25. The power which the pope has, in a general way, over purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or curate has, in a special way, within his own diocese or parish.

26. The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession.

27. They preach man who say that so soon as the penny jingles into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory].

28. It is certain that when the penny jingles into the money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the result of the intercession of the Church is in the power of God alone.

29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be bought out of it, as in the legend of Sts. Severinus and Paschal.

30. No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much less that he has attained full remission.

31. Rare as is the man that is truly penitent, so rare is also the man who truly buys indulgences, i.e., such men are most rare.

32. They will be condemned eternally, together with their teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation because they have letters of pardon.

33. Men must be on their guard against those who say that the pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to Him;

34. For these "graces of pardon" concern only the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are appointed by man.

35. They preach no Christian doctrine who teach that contrition is not necessary in those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessionalia.

36. Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of pardon.

37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is granted him by God, even without letters of pardon.

38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission.

39. It is most difficult, even for the very keenest theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people the abundance of pardons and [the need of] true contrition.

40. True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but liberal pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated, or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them].

41. Apostolic pardons are to be preached with caution, lest the people may falsely think them preferable to other good works of love.

42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend the buying of pardons to be compared in any way to works of mercy.

43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better work than buying pardons;

44. Because love grows by works of love, and man becomes better; but by pardons man does not grow better, only more free from penalty.

45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a man in need, and passes him by, and gives [his money] for pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but the indignation of God.

46. Christians are to be taught that unless they have more than they need, they are bound to keep back what is necessary for their own families, and by no means to squander it on pardons.

47. Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is a matter of free will, and not of commandment.

48. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting pardons, needs, and therefore desires, their devout prayer for him more than the money they bring.

49. Christians are to be taught that the pope's pardons are useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but altogether harmful, if through them they lose their fear of God.

50. Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that St. Peter's church should go to ashes, than that it should be built up with the skin, flesh and bones of his sheep.

51. Christians are to be taught that it would be the pope's wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money to very many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to be sold.

52. The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is vain, even though the commissary, nay, even though the pope himself, were to stake his soul upon it.

53. They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who bid the Word of God be altogether silent in some Churches, in order that pardons may be preached in others.

54. Injury is done the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on this Word.

55. It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons, which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.

56. The "treasures of the Church," out of which the pope. grants indulgences, are not sufficiently named or known among the people of Christ.

57. That they are not temporal treasures is certainly evident, for many of the vendors do not pour out such treasures so easily, but only gather them.

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for even without the pope, these always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward man.

59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were the Church's poor, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time.

60. Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church, given by Christ's merit, are that treasure;

61. For it is clear that for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself sufficient.

62. The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last.

64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.

65. Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which they formerly were wont to fish for men of riches.

66. The treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they now fish for the riches of men.

67. The indulgences which the preachers cry as the "greatest graces" are known to be truly such, in so far as they promote gain.

68. Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross.

69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of apostolic pardons, with all reverence.

70. But still more are they bound to strain all their eyes and attend with all their ears, lest these men preach their own dreams instead of the commission of the pope.

71. He who speaks against the truth of apostolic pardons, let him be anathema and accursed!

72. But he who guards against the lust and license of the pardon-preachers, let him be blessed!

73. The pope justly thunders against those who, by any art, contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons.

74. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy love and truth.

75. To think the papal pardons so great that they could absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin and violated the Mother of God -- this is madness.

76. We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as its guilt is concerned.

77. It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy against St. Peter and against the pope.

78. We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; to wit, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written in I. Corinthians xii.

79. To say that the cross, emblazoned with the papal arms, which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy.

80. The bishops, curates and theologians who allow such talk to be spread among the people, will have an account to render.

81. This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it no easy matter, even for learned men, to rescue the reverence due to the pope from slander, or even from the shrewd questionings of the laity.

82. To wit: -- "Why does not the pope empty purgatory, for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the souls that are there, if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the latter is most trivial."

83. Again: -- "Why are mortuary and anniversary masses for the dead continued, and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded on their behalf, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?"

84. Again: -- "What is this new piety of God and the pope, that for money they allow a man who is impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God, and do not rather, because of that pious and beloved soul's own need, free it for pure love's sake?"

85. Again: -- "Why are the penitential canons long since in actual fact and through disuse abrogated and dead, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they were still alive and in force?"

86. Again: -- "Why does not the pope, whose wealth is to-day greater than the riches of the richest, build just this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with the money of poor believers?"

87. Again: -- "What is it that the pope remits, and what participation does he grant to those who, by perfect contrition, have a right to full remission and participation?"

88. Again: -- "What greater blessing could come to the Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day what he now does once, and bestow on every believer these remissions and participations?"

89. "Since the pope, by his pardons, seeks the salvation of souls rather than money, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons granted heretofore, since these have equal efficacy?"

90. To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy.

91. If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved; nay, they would not exist.

92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Peace, peace," and there is no peace!
93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Cross, cross," and there is no cross!

94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hell;

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather through many tribulations, than through the assurance of peace.

2008年8月4日 星期一

哥前13<分享與討論>


上帝在教會所設立的,第一是使徒,第二是……,第三是……
……。你們要切切的求那更大的恩賜,我現今把最妙的道指示你們。
(哥前12:28-31
更大的恩賜是什麼?上帝藉Paul所要指示給我們那最妙的道是什麼?有什麼更大的恩賜是大於說及翻譯方言、教師、先知,甚至大於使徒的呢?那其中最神妙的道理是什麼?哥前13接著說:
我若能……,我若有……,卻沒有愛,我就算不得什麼。我若將所有的賙濟窮人,又捨己身叫人焚燒,卻沒有愛,仍然與我無益。(1-3
為什麼?難道我若能做任何事、我若擁有全世界、贏得全人類的掌聲及崇高的名聲,甚至為別人受苦,卻只因我沒有愛,我仍算不得什麼也仍與我無益嗎?
現實上,這其實是真的非常令人稱羨及夢寐以求的,而且當然非常益於自己。只是,這就是身而為人應該在此生此世的終極目標?單單一個人,如何能做「任何」事、擁有「全」世界、贏得「每個人」的掌聲及「永恆」的名聲?這就是最大的恩賜?如果這就是確定無疑最大的恩賜,那,死了之後?如果活一百歲,那一百年之後,死了,什麼都結束了,這會是最大的恩賜?恩賜若不能延續到身體消亡之後如何是最大的賞賜?
若有能延續到身體消亡後的賞賜,誰來保障這一切得以實現?活人可以?死人可以?一個生前德行很好,死後受大家崇拜的死人可以?鬼可以?如果鬼可以,那如何聯想生前與鬼同在而得鬼的賞賜,死後與鬼常存的那個賞賜會是什麼鬼東西?又,若是鬼來保障這一切,那活著還能有什麼盼望?
況且,說實在的,我,這一個人,有什麼資格承接這超越死亡的恩賜?全世界的人有誰總是良善的及沒犯過罪的得以相稱地承接這超越死亡的永恆恩賜?又,到底誰能保障一個永恆的恩賜?至少,理性可以理解:非永恆的是不可能保障永恆的,只能是永恆的才能保障永恆的可能——永恆者分享及保障祂的永恆給非永恆者。
什麼是永恆?愛是永不止息(8,只有愛是永恆的。而那屬世的一切,等那完全的來到,這有限的必歸於無有了(10,而這其中上帝愛的恩典的神妙道理,我們是模糊不清(12,不過如今所知道的有限,到那時就全知道,如同主知道我一樣(12。那,什麼是愛?感謝主,祂教導說:
愛是恆久忍耐,又有恩慈;愛是不嫉妒;愛是不自誇,不張狂,不做害羞的事,不求自己的益處,不輕易發怒,不計算人的惡,不喜歡不義,只喜歡真理;凡事包容,凡事相信,凡事盼望,凡事忍耐。愛是永不止息。(4-8
約翰一書第四章:
親愛的弟兄阿,我們應當彼此相愛。因為愛是從神來的。凡有愛心的,都是由神而生,並且認識神。沒有愛心的,就不認識神。因為神就是愛。神差他獨生子到世間來,使我們藉著他得生,神愛我們的心,在此就顯明了。不是我們愛神,乃是神愛我們,差他的兒子,為我們的罪作了挽回祭,這就是愛了。親愛的弟兄阿,神既是這樣愛我們,我們也當彼此相愛。(7-11
其實,我的理性還是不能完全掌握其中的奧秘,但上帝清楚明瞭教導我們:上帝就是愛,愛是從上帝來的凡有愛心的就是認識上帝。愛的源頭、愛的獲得及愛是什麼都是同一個問題——認識上帝。而上帝也清楚明瞭地教導愛的真諦:愛是恆久忍耐又有恩慈,……。並親自做了最高的示範——為我們的罪作了挽回祭
主阿,以經解經、清楚明瞭、聖靈教導了,我也感動了、也懊悔了,為何我還是常健忘你的教導呢?主阿,懇求你的赦免及憐憫,將祢的教導銘刻在我們心中,叫我們常常以你的教導為糧勝過三餐的本能,阿們。

2008年7月31日 星期四

哥前12<分享與討論>


上帝阿……主阿主阿……地這樣叫,這如此平常的習慣,我平常是不會有什麼特別感受的。然而,身處在拜偶像的家庭,越想嘗試分享福音而受挫,我越是能體會及感動:若不是被聖靈感動的,也沒有能說耶穌是主的3)面對我的家人隨事被牽引受迷惑,在傳福音上,我常為想解釋些什麼而生氣;我越想做點什麼,就越發現他們付出的愛總是比我多更多;我以為分析地非常清晰明瞭易於理解,就越疑惑他們還是不能接受,……。只是,我無力感越重,卻總是因此覺得更親近、倚靠上帝。當我越不憂心家人信主的事時,我常在回頭反省時驚覺那同時是我最懶散、最不愛主的時候,也因此我很難去愛其他人甚至是我的家人,因為我沒有愛。主阿,這就是你說的:身上肢體人以為軟弱的,更是不可少的的用意嗎?雖然我們都厭惡自己軟弱,也會為所愛的人的軟弱所苦,但在軟弱中似乎又有上帝愛的教導的奧秘,我的主,是這樣嗎?
恩賜(gift,新標點和合本)原有分別,聖靈卻有一位。……聖靈顯在各人
身上,是叫人得益處。……這一切都是這位聖靈所運行,隨己意分給各人的。
感謝主憐憫我讓我可以稱祂為主。只是,在主對我的憐憫及恩賜上,我叫什麼人得什麼益處?就最大的益處,福音,我渴慕理解而分享而體現完全?就最愛的家人,我常憂心他們可能在此世都不會信主?我知道我不需憂心反要不住地禱告,對上帝有信心。問題是我常是不憂心的,我的不憂心不是上帝安慰我的結果,是因為我常對此事是不很在意的,所以我常是不憂心的,當然更別提因憂心而不住地禱告,然後得上帝的安慰而不憂心了。我也知道這是上帝隨己意分給各人的,……只是,這常是我遇到挫折時的藉口,而不是信心。
主阿,我開始感覺叫你主阿會讓我鼻酸了。
當我渴慕祢時,我才驚覺我常是不渴慕你的;當我對福音缺乏、無力時,才驚覺原來我不能做點什麼。主阿,都交給你,好不好?求你憐憫,阿們。